Current Protocols in Human Genetics

427 papers and 10.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 427 papers published in Current Protocols in Human Genetics in the last decades have received a total of 10.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Current Protocols in Human Genetics usually cover Molecular Biology (271 papers), Genetics (218 papers) and Plant Science (38 papers) specifically the topics of Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (76 papers), Genomics and Rare Diseases (62 papers) and Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications (51 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Current Protocols in Human Genetics are Daniel M. Jordan, Ivan Adzhubei, Shamil Sunyaev, Stacey B. Gabriel, Liuda Ziaugra, Diana Tabbaa, Stephen F. Little, Arleen D. Auerbach, Wylie Burke and Daniel Shriner.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Current Protocols in Human Genetics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Current Protocols in Human Genetics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Current Protocols in Human Genetics.

Countries where authors publish in Current Protocols in Human Genetics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Current Protocols in Human Genetics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Current Protocols in Human Genetics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Current Protocols in Human Genetics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025