Gill Plain

700 citations
34 papers · 246 · h-index 7

Impact in

    • Crime and Detective Fiction Studies
    • Modernist Literature and Criticism
    • Contemporary Literature and Criticism
    • Poetry Analysis and Criticism
  • History top 5%

Papers in

Gill Plain

23 papers receiving 146 citations

Peers

Gill Plain
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
  • Literature and Literary Theory 156
  • History 49
  • Cultural Studies 29
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 16
  • Museology 11
Replace Michael Anesko with:
Michael Anesko United States
José F. Colmeiro New Zealand
Deborah L Parsons
Ronald Bush United Kingdom
Margo Hendricks United States
Sarah Cole United States
Janet Pérez United States
Daniel Cottom
Linda K. Hughes United States
Andrew Thacker United Kingdom
Gill Plain relative to Michael Anesko United States Michael Anesko's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7×
Michael Anesko · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gill Plain

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gill Plain's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gill Plain with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gill Plain more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gill Plain

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gill Plain. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gill Plain. The network helps show where Gill Plain may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Gill Plain, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gill Plain Line = papers co-authored together Gill Plain links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200195
2 201359
3 200723
4 200612
5 199512
6 20069
7 20087
8 20095
9 19985
10 20074
11 20132
12 20202
13 19941
14 20251
15 20201
16 20071
17 20071
18 20031
19 20141
20 19951

About Gill Plain

Gill Plain is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, History and Cultural Studies, having authored 34 papers that have together received 246 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Crime and Detective Fiction Studies (11 papers), World Wars: History, Literature, and Impact (9 papers), French Historical and Cultural Studies (6 papers), Irish and British Studies (6 papers), Political and Economic history of UK and US (4 papers), Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (3 papers), Historical Gender and Feminism Studies (3 papers) and European history and politics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (156 citations), History (49 citations), Cultural Studies (29 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (16 citations) and Museology (11 citations). Gill Plain has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Barbara Harlow, Susan Sellers, Phyllis Lassner, Marina MacKay, Dagmar Barnouw, Robert Gordon, Debarati Sanyal, James Dawes, Margot Norris and Adam Piette. Their work appears in journals such as Critical Survey, Feminist Review, Time & Society, Journal of British Cinema and Television and Journal of War and Culture Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact