CONTINUUM Lifelong Learning in Neurology

18.8k citations
1.3k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

  • Neurology top 5%
    • Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
    • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
    • Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
    • Epilepsy research and treatment
    • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
    • Migraine and Headache Studies

Papers in

    • Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders 114
    • Neurological disorders and treatments 87
    • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances 71
    • Epilepsy research and treatment 107
    • Migraine and Headache Studies 72

CONTINUUM Lifelong Learning in Neurology

1.2k papers receiving 17.4k citations

Peers

CONTINUUM Lifelong Learning in Neurology
Comparison fields: 5 of 193
  • Neurology 5.7k
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 4.3k
  • Neurology 2.2k
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 2.6k
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 2.2k
Replace Journal of Clinical Neurology with:
Journal of Clinical Neurology South Korea
The Neurologist United States
Current Treatment Options in Neurology United States
Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders Germany
Practical Neurology United Kingdom
Acta Neurologica Belgica Türkiye
Brain Communications United States
Neuroimaging Clinics of North America United States
Aging and Disease China
Seminars in Pediatric Neurology United States
CONTINUUM Lifelong Learning in Neurology relative to Journal of Clinical Neurology South Korea Journal of Clinical Neurology's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Journal of Clinical Neurology · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in CONTINUUM Lifelong Learning in Neurology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in CONTINUUM Lifelong Learning in Neurology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in CONTINUUM Lifelong Learning in Neurology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites CONTINUUM Lifelong Learning in Neurology more than expected).

Fields of papers published in CONTINUUM Lifelong Learning in Neurology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in CONTINUUM Lifelong Learning in Neurology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in CONTINUUM Lifelong Learning in Neurology.

About CONTINUUM Lifelong Learning in Neurology

The 1.3k papers published in CONTINUUM Lifelong Learning in Neurology in the last decades have received a total of 18.8k indexed citations . Papers published in CONTINUUM Lifelong Learning in Neurology usually cover Neurology (521 papers), Psychiatry and Mental health (308 papers), Neurology (107 papers), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (195 papers) and Genetics (101 papers) specifically the topics of Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders (114 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (107 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (87 papers), Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (77 papers), Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (77 papers), Migraine and Headache Studies (72 papers), Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (72 papers) and Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (71 papers). The most active scholars publishing in CONTINUUM Lifelong Learning in Neurology are Ronald C. Petersen, Alejandro A. Rabinstein, Cheryl Bushnell, Amy Guzik, Michael D. Geschwind, Stephen D. Silberstein, Mario F. Mendez, Jeffrey P. Staab, Liana G. Apostolova and Stephen N. Gomperts.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact