Countries where authors publish in Aging and Disease
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Aging and Disease. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Aging and Disease with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Aging and Disease more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Aging and Disease. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Aging and Disease.
About Aging and Disease
The 1.4k papers published in Aging and Disease in the last decades have received a total of 38.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Aging and Disease usually cover Aging (58 papers), Neurology (226 papers), Biological Psychiatry (58 papers), Geriatrics and Gerontology (69 papers) and Physiology (356 papers) specifically the topics of Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (163 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (102 papers), Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (61 papers), Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (61 papers), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (61 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (60 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (58 papers) and Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms (58 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Aging and Disease are Kunlin Jin, Eduardo Lusa Cadore, Haiping Zhao, Igor B. Afanasʹev, Supakanya Wongrakpanich, Janani Rangaswami, Yumin Luo, Amaraporn Wongrakpanich, Francesca Bonomini and Rita Rezzani.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.