Contemporary Economics

372 papers and 2.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 372 papers published in Contemporary Economics in the last decades have received a total of 2.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Contemporary Economics usually cover Economics and Econometrics (172 papers), Accounting (78 papers) and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (74 papers) specifically the topics of Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (32 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (28 papers) and Corporate Finance and Governance (27 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Contemporary Economics are Janusz Czapiński, Tomasz Panek, Nurudeen Abu, Nicholas M. Odhiambo, Sheilla Nyasha, Dalia Štreimikienė, Mario Arturo Ruiz Estrada, Hrabrin Bachev, Élissar Toufaily and Tatiana Zalan.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Contemporary Economics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Contemporary Economics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Contemporary Economics.

Countries where authors publish in Contemporary Economics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Contemporary Economics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Contemporary Economics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Contemporary Economics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025