Journal of Operator Theory

492 papers and 2.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 492 papers published in Journal of Operator Theory in the last decades have received a total of 2.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Operator Theory usually cover Mathematical Physics (340 papers), Applied Mathematics (247 papers) and Algebra and Number Theory (217 papers) specifically the topics of Advanced Operator Algebra Research (218 papers), Advanced Topics in Algebra (212 papers) and Holomorphic and Operator Theory (191 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Operator Theory are N. Christopher Phillips, E. B. Davies, Michael A. Dritschel, Scott McCullough, Sergey Neshveyev, Zhong‐Jin Ruan, Roger Plymen, Ali S. Kavruk, Edward G. Effros and Martijn Caspers.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Operator Theory

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Operator Theory. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Operator Theory.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Operator Theory

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Operator Theory. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Operator Theory with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Operator Theory more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025