European Constitutional Law Review

4.3k citations
567 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

  • Law top 2%
    • Judicial and Constitutional Studies
    • European and International Law Studies
    • European Union Policy and Governance
    • European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
    • International Law and Human Rights
    • Social Policy and Reform Studies
    • Populism, Right-Wing Movements

Papers in

  • Law 195
    • Judicial and Constitutional Studies 92
    • European and International Law Studies 343
    • European Criminal Justice and Data Protection 178
    • European Union Policy and Governance 122
    • International Law and Human Rights 26

European Constitutional Law Review

447 papers receiving 2.9k citations

Peers

European Constitutional Law Review
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Law 1.4k
  • Political Science and International Relations 3.3k
  • Industrial relations 19
  • Finance 289
  • Strategy and Management 371
Replace Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law with:
Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law Netherlands
Yearbook of European Law United Kingdom
Cambridge yearbook of European legal studies United Kingdom
Human Rights Law Review United Kingdom
Theoretical Inquiries in Law United States
Utrecht Law Review Netherlands
Ratio Juris United States
Law and Philosophy United States
Current Legal Problems United Kingdom
˜The œAmerican University law review United States
European Constitutional Law Review relative to Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law Netherlands Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in European Constitutional Law Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in European Constitutional Law Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in European Constitutional Law Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites European Constitutional Law Review more than expected).

Fields of papers published in European Constitutional Law Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in European Constitutional Law Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in European Constitutional Law Review.

About European Constitutional Law Review

The 567 papers published in European Constitutional Law Review in the last decades have received a total of 4.3k indexed citations . Papers published in European Constitutional Law Review usually cover Law (195 papers), Political Science and International Relations (466 papers), Accounting (94 papers), Strategy and Management (44 papers) and Finance (20 papers) specifically the topics of European and International Law Studies (343 papers), European Criminal Justice and Data Protection (178 papers), European Union Policy and Governance (122 papers), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (92 papers), Taxation and Legal Issues (89 papers), Human Rights and Immigration (34 papers), International Arbitration and Investment Law (33 papers) and International Law and Human Rights (26 papers). The most active scholars publishing in European Constitutional Law Review are Kerem Altıparmak, Koen Lenaerts, Steve Peers, Jan Komárek, Mark Dawson, Claire Kilpatrick, Sacha Garben, David Kosař, Paul Craig and Bruno De Witte.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact