JTO Clinical and Research Reports

491 papers and 2.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 491 papers published in JTO Clinical and Research Reports in the last decades have received a total of 2.8k indexed citations. Papers published in JTO Clinical and Research Reports usually cover Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (370 papers), Oncology (299 papers) and Molecular Biology (75 papers) specifically the topics of Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (287 papers), Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (129 papers) and Lung Cancer Research Studies (116 papers). The most active scholars publishing in JTO Clinical and Research Reports are Sai‐Hong Ignatius Ou, Misako Nagasaka, Viola W. Zhu, James Chih‐Hsin Yang, Edward B. Garon, Steven M. Dubinett, Sanjay Popat, Daniel B. Costa, Susumu Kobayashi and Suresh S. Ramalingam.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in JTO Clinical and Research Reports

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in JTO Clinical and Research Reports. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in JTO Clinical and Research Reports.

Countries where authors publish in JTO Clinical and Research Reports

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in JTO Clinical and Research Reports. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in JTO Clinical and Research Reports with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites JTO Clinical and Research Reports more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025