Computers in Human Behavior Reports

598 papers and 5.8k indexed citations

About

The 598 papers published in Computers in Human Behavior Reports in the last decades have received a total of 5.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Computers in Human Behavior Reports usually cover Sociology and Political Science (276 papers), Social Psychology (133 papers) and Education (101 papers) specifically the topics of Impact of Technology on Adolescents (159 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (78 papers) and Child Development and Digital Technology (72 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Computers in Human Behavior Reports are Meng‐Jia Wu, Paul Rodway, Astrid Schepman, Emily O’Day, Richard G. Heimberg, David John Lemay, Paul Bazelais, Tenzin Doleck, Ahmet Ayaz and Seife Dendir.

In The Last Decade

Computers in Human Behavior Reports

448 papers receiving 5.5k citations

Fields of papers published in Computers in Human Behavior Reports

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Computers in Human Behavior Reports. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Computers in Human Behavior Reports.

Countries where authors publish in Computers in Human Behavior Reports

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Computers in Human Behavior Reports. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Computers in Human Behavior Reports with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Computers in Human Behavior Reports more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026