Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review

6.2k citations
499 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review

442 papers receiving 5.7k citations

Peers

Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review
Comparison fields: 5 of 138
  • Business and International Management 631
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 2.1k
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 1.1k
  • Strategy and Management 1.5k
  • Health Informatics 98
Replace Management Review Quarterly with:
Management Review Quarterly Germany
Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management India
Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management India
Information and Organization United States
Global Business and Organizational Excellence United States
Business & Information Systems Engineering Germany
Asia Pacific Management Review Taiwan
Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship Ethiopia
Journal of Modelling in Management India
Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society United Kingdom
Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review relative to Management Review Quarterly Germany Management Review Quarterly's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.1×
Management Review Quarterly · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review.

About Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review

The 499 papers published in Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review in the last decades have received a total of 6.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review usually cover Management of Technology and Innovation (151 papers), Business and International Management (34 papers), Strategy and Management (161 papers), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (79 papers) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (85 papers) specifically the topics of Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (142 papers), International Business and FDI (94 papers), Family Business Performance and Succession (52 papers), Global trade and economics (50 papers), Global Trade and Competitiveness (47 papers), Innovation and Socioeconomic Development (33 papers), Business and Economic Development (32 papers) and Corporate Finance and Governance (26 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review are Krzysztof Wach, Witold Nowiński, Paweł Korzyński, Grzegorz Mazurek, Łukasz Sułkowski, Jan Brzozowski, Cong Doanh Duong, Chen Liu, Thuy Thu Nguyen and Andrzej Cieślik.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact