Contemporary Security Policy

782 papers and 6.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 782 papers published in Contemporary Security Policy in the last decades have received a total of 6.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Contemporary Security Policy usually cover Political Science and International Relations (589 papers), Sociology and Political Science (334 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (133 papers) specifically the topics of International Relations and Foreign Policy (269 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (162 papers) and Peacebuilding and International Security (147 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Contemporary Security Policy are Michael P. A. Murphy, Trine Flockhart, Stuart Croft, Nathalie Tocci, Jeffrey W. Knopf, Olivier Schmitt, Ana E. Juncos, Elena Korosteleva, Nick Ritchie and Diane E. Davis.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Contemporary Security Policy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Contemporary Security Policy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Contemporary Security Policy.

Countries where authors publish in Contemporary Security Policy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Contemporary Security Policy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Contemporary Security Policy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Contemporary Security Policy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025