Computer Standards & Interfaces

39.3k citations
2.3k papers · · active since 2016

Impact in

    • User Authentication and Security Systems
    • Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services
    • Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
    • Advanced Authentication Protocols Security
    • IoT and Edge/Fog Computing

Papers in

Computer Standards & Interfaces

2.1k papers receiving 36.3k citations

Peers

Computer Standards & Interfaces
Comparison fields: 5 of 220
  • Information Systems 12.9k
  • Computer Networks and Communications 12.7k
  • Software 1.5k
  • Management Information Systems 3.2k
  • Artificial Intelligence 10.7k
Replace Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences with:
Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences China
Cluster Computing China
IT Professional United States
IEEE Systems Journal China
IEEE Transactions on Services Computing China
Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing China
IEEE Intelligent Systems United States
IEEE Internet Computing United States
Information China
IEEE Security & Privacy United States
Computer Standards & Interfaces relative to Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences China Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.4×
Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Computer Standards & Interfaces

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Computer Standards & Interfaces. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Computer Standards & Interfaces with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Computer Standards & Interfaces more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Computer Standards & Interfaces

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Computer Standards & Interfaces. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Computer Standards & Interfaces.

About Computer Standards & Interfaces

The 2.3k papers published in Computer Standards & Interfaces in the last decades have received a total of 39.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Computer Standards & Interfaces usually cover Software (150 papers), Computer Networks and Communications (795 papers), Information Systems (748 papers), Hardware and Architecture (191 papers) and Artificial Intelligence (708 papers) specifically the topics of Cryptography and Data Security (276 papers), Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services (210 papers), Software Engineering Research (121 papers), Advanced Authentication Protocols Security (111 papers), Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (104 papers), Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data (102 papers), Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (99 papers) and Business Process Modeling and Analysis (92 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Computer Standards & Interfaces are Istvan Sebestyen, Martin Riedmiller, David C. Chou, David C. Yen, Michele Chinosi, Alberto Trombetta, Borka Jerman-Blažič, Ronggong Song, Gülçin Büyüközkan and Tomaž Klobučar.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact