Michael B. Spring

60 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Michael B. Spring
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Applied Psychology 281
  • Human-Computer Interaction 69
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 34
  • Pharmacy 28
  • General Health Professions 165
Replace Jina Huh with:
Jina Huh United States
Sun Young Park United States
Kirsikka Kaipainen Finland
Marcos Báez Italy
Kael Rowan United States
Jeana H. Frost United States
Emre Sezgın United States
Rafał Kocielnik United States
Somaya Ben Allouch Netherlands
Jill Freyne Australia
Michael B. Spring relative to Jina Huh United States Jina Huh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.3×
Jina Huh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael B. Spring

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael B. Spring's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael B. Spring with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael B. Spring more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael B. Spring

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael B. Spring. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael B. Spring. The network helps show where Michael B. Spring may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael B. Spring, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael B. Spring Line = papers co-authored together Michael B. Spring links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993191
2 2010128
3 2007122
4 2016101
5 2005100
6 2017100
7 201385
8 200983
9 200572
10
A Harmony based Adaptive Ontology Mapping Approach
200830
11 201730
12 201026
13 200720
14 201120
15 200819
16 199917
17 200317
18 202217
19 200914
20 201314

About Michael B. Spring

Michael B. Spring is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Human-Computer Interaction, Information Systems, Management Information Systems and Human Factors and Ergonomics, having authored 65 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Semantic Web and Ontologies (16 papers), Usability and User Interface Design (7 papers), Information Systems and Technology Applications (5 papers), Digital Platforms and Economics (5 papers), Data Visualization and Analytics (5 papers), Library Science and Information Systems (5 papers), Quality and Management Systems (4 papers) and Digital Accessibility for Disabilities (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (281 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (69 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (34 citations), Pharmacy (28 citations) and General Health Professions (165 citations). Michael B. Spring has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Thailand and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Armando J. Rotondi, Yefei Peng, Ming Mao, Christina Evangeline Newhill, James Gordon Williams, Robert R. Korfhage, Kai A. Olsen, Shaun M. Eack, Jennifer Sinkule and Gretchen L. Haas. Their work appears in journals such as Computer Standards & Interfaces, Computer, The Electronic Library, Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation and Schizophrenia Bulletin.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact