Michael B. Spring

2.6k citations
69 papers · 1.8k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Michael B. Spring

63 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Michael B. Spring
Comparison fields: 5 of 132
  • Applied Psychology 264
  • Human-Computer Interaction 214
  • Computer Science Applications 76
  • Information Systems 282
  • Artificial Intelligence 379
Replace Tim Althoff with:
Tim Althoff United States
Deborah Richards Australia
Michael McTear United Kingdom
Kay Connelly United States
Silvia Gabrielli Italy
Shion Guha United States
Kelly Caine United States
Tad Hirsch United States
Jeana Frost United States
Neal Lathia United Kingdom
Michael B. Spring relative to Tim Althoff United States Tim Althoff's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.5×
Tim Althoff · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael B. Spring

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael B. Spring's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael B. Spring with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael B. Spring more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael B. Spring

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael B. Spring. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael B. Spring. The network helps show where Michael B. Spring may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael B. Spring, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael B. Spring Line = papers co-authored together Michael B. Spring links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 69 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1991420
2 1993172
3 2010120
4 2007115
5 2005101
6 201697
7 201796
8 201385
9 200568
10 200964
11
A Harmony based Adaptive Ontology Mapping Approach
200830
12 201726
13 201023
14 201119
15 200719
16 200817
17 200316
18 199916
19 201315
20 199713

About Michael B. Spring

Michael B. Spring is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, Computer Networks and Communications, Oncology and Applied Psychology, having authored 69 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Semantic Web and Ontologies (20 papers), Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services (9 papers), Web Data Mining and Analysis (9 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (6 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (5 papers), Advanced Database Systems and Queries (5 papers), Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (5 papers) and Natural Language Processing Techniques (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (264 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (214 citations), Computer Science Applications (76 citations), Information Systems (282 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (379 citations). Michael B. Spring has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Chile. Frequent co-authors include Armando J. Rotondi, Yefei Peng, Ming Mao, Christina E. Newhill, James Williams, Kai A. Olsen, Robert R. Korfhage, Shaun M. Eack, Gretchen L. Haas and Rohan Ganguli. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Computer Standards & Interfaces, Computer, Journal of Medical Internet Research and Publishing Research Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact