IT Professional

21.6k citations
1.6k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
    • Cloud Computing and Resource Management
    • Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services
    • Cloud Data Security Solutions
    • Big Data and Business Intelligence

Papers in

    • Big Data and Business Intelligence 128
    • Information Technology Governance and Strategy 76
    • Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services 97
    • Information and Cyber Security 87
    • Blockchain Technology Applications and Security 75
    • Software Engineering Techniques and Practices 71

IT Professional

1.2k papers receiving 17.6k citations

Peers

IT Professional
Comparison fields: 5 of 205
  • Information Systems 9.0k
  • Management Information Systems 3.0k
  • Computer Networks and Communications 6.3k
  • Information Systems and Management 1.4k
  • Computer Science Applications 999
Replace Computer Standards & Interfaces with:
Computer Standards & Interfaces China
Future Internet China
Journal Of Big Data United States
IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics - Part A Systems and Humans United States
IEEE Intelligent Systems United States
AI Magazine United States
Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory China
Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences China
Expert Systems India
Journal of Intelligent Information Systems United States
IT Professional relative to Computer Standards & Interfaces China Computer Standards & Interfaces's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Computer Standards & Interfaces · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in IT Professional

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in IT Professional. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in IT Professional with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites IT Professional more than expected).

Fields of papers published in IT Professional

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in IT Professional. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in IT Professional.

About IT Professional

The 1.6k papers published in IT Professional in the last decades have received a total of 21.6k indexed citations . Papers published in IT Professional usually cover Management Information Systems (255 papers), Information Systems (547 papers), Computer Networks and Communications (362 papers), Computer Science Applications (82 papers) and Software (35 papers) specifically the topics of Big Data and Business Intelligence (128 papers), Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services (97 papers), Information and Cyber Security (87 papers), IoT and Edge/Fog Computing (86 papers), Information Technology Governance and Strategy (76 papers), Blockchain Technology Applications and Security (75 papers), Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (71 papers) and Advanced Malware Detection Techniques (68 papers). The most active scholars publishing in IT Professional are Nir Kshetri, San Murugesan, Jeffrey Voas, Robert L. Grossman, Phillip A. Laplante, George Hurlburt, Haluk Demirkan, Seth Earley, Jia Zhang and Tom Costello.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact