IEEE Internet Computing

63.6k citations
2.1k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
    • Caching and Content Delivery
    • Peer-to-Peer Network Technologies
    • Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems
    • Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services
    • Cloud Computing and Resource Management
    • Recommender Systems and Techniques

Papers in

    • Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems 172
    • Peer-to-Peer Network Technologies 165
    • Caching and Content Delivery 153
    • Mobile Agent-Based Network Management 128
    • IoT and Edge/Fog Computing 127
    • Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services 295
    • Cloud Computing and Resource Management 171

IEEE Internet Computing

1.8k papers receiving 56.7k citations

Peers

IEEE Internet Computing
Comparison fields: 5 of 214
  • Computer Networks and Communications 32.1k
  • Information Systems 28.6k
  • Artificial Intelligence 18.1k
  • Management Information Systems 4.9k
  • Computer Science Applications 2.8k
Replace IBM Systems Journal with:
IBM Systems Journal United States
Journal of Network and Computer Applications China
ACM Transactions on Information Systems China
IEEE Network China
IEEE Intelligent Systems United States
Information Systems United States
Computer Standards & Interfaces China
IEEE Transactions on Services Computing China
ACM SIGMOD Record United States
IEEE Security & Privacy United States
IEEE Internet Computing relative to IBM Systems Journal United States IBM Systems Journal's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
IBM Systems Journal · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in IEEE Internet Computing

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in IEEE Internet Computing. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in IEEE Internet Computing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites IEEE Internet Computing more than expected).

Fields of papers published in IEEE Internet Computing

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in IEEE Internet Computing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in IEEE Internet Computing.

About IEEE Internet Computing

The 2.1k papers published in IEEE Internet Computing in the last decades have received a total of 63.6k indexed citations . Papers published in IEEE Internet Computing usually cover Computer Networks and Communications (975 papers), Information Systems (795 papers), Artificial Intelligence (541 papers), Information Systems and Management (108 papers) and Computer Science Applications (80 papers) specifically the topics of Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services (295 papers), Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems (172 papers), Cloud Computing and Resource Management (171 papers), Peer-to-Peer Network Technologies (165 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (159 papers), Caching and Content Delivery (153 papers), Mobile Agent-Based Network Management (128 papers) and IoT and Edge/Fog Computing (127 papers). The most active scholars publishing in IEEE Internet Computing are Daniel A. Menascé, Greg Linden, Brent Smith, Steve Vinoski, Jeremy York, Munindar P. Singh, Amit Sheth, Michael N. Huhns, Schahram Dustdar and George Pallis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact