Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici

36.1k citations
2.0k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Geometric and Algebraic Topology
    • Algebraic structures and combinatorial models
    • Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory
    • Geometry and complex manifolds
    • Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology
    • Advanced Algebra and Geometry

Papers in

    • Geometric and Algebraic Topology 484
    • Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory 338
    • Geometry and complex manifolds 215
    • Algebraic structures and combinatorial models 187
    • Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology 404
    • Advanced Algebra and Geometry 270

Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici

1.7k papers receiving 27.1k citations

Peers

Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici
Comparison fields: 5 of 156
  • Geometry and Topology 25.3k
  • Mathematical Physics 19.1k
  • Algebra and Number Theory 6.7k
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 3.8k
  • Applied Mathematics 12.2k
Replace Illinois Journal of Mathematics with:
Illinois Journal of Mathematics United States
Annales Scientifiques de l École Normale Supérieure France
Annales de l’institut Fourier France
Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society United States
The Quarterly Journal of Mathematics United Kingdom
The Michigan Mathematical Journal United States
Topology United States
Compositio Mathematica United States
Journal of the Mathematical Society of Japan Japan
Journal of the American Mathematical Society United States
Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici relative to Illinois Journal of Mathematics United States Illinois Journal of Mathematics's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
Illinois Journal of Mathematics · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici.

About Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici

The 2.0k papers published in Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici in the last decades have received a total of 36.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici usually cover Geometry and Topology (1.3k papers), Mathematical Physics (917 papers), Algebra and Number Theory (380 papers), Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (200 papers) and Applied Mathematics (587 papers) specifically the topics of Geometric and Algebraic Topology (484 papers), Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (404 papers), Geometric Analysis and Curvature Flows (361 papers), Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (338 papers), Advanced Algebra and Geometry (270 papers), Advanced Topics in Algebra (245 papers), Geometry and complex manifolds (215 papers) and Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (187 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici are Jean-Pierre Serre, René Thom, Jerome Levine, Armand Borel, Alfréd Huber, Michaël Struwe, Chang‐Shou Lin, John N. Mather, John Milnor and André Haefliger.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact