Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici

2.2k papers and 40.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.2k papers published in Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici in the last decades have received a total of 40.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici usually cover Geometry and Topology (1.4k papers), Mathematical Physics (1.0k papers) and Applied Mathematics (628 papers) specifically the topics of Geometric and Algebraic Topology (545 papers), Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (441 papers) and Optimal Transport in Geometry and Analysis (390 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici are René Thom, Jean-Pierre Serre, Jerome Levine, Armand Borel, Alfréd Huber, Michaël Struwe, Chang‐Shou Lin, John N. Mather, André Haefliger and John Milnor.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici.

Countries where authors publish in Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Commentarii Mathematici Helvetici more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025