Cognition and Instruction

599 papers and 45.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 599 papers published in Cognition and Instruction in the last decades have received a total of 45.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Cognition and Instruction usually cover Education (403 papers), Developmental and Educational Psychology (327 papers) and Statistics and Probability (142 papers) specifically the topics of Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (194 papers), Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (141 papers) and Science Education and Pedagogy (130 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cognition and Instruction are Andrea A. diSessa, John Sweller, Ann L. Brown, Paul Chandler, David Hammer, Susan Bobbitt Nolen, Barbara Y. White, Walter Kintsch, Daniel L. Schwartz and Manu Kapur.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Cognition and Instruction

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Cognition and Instruction. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cognition and Instruction.

Countries where authors publish in Cognition and Instruction

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cognition and Instruction. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cognition and Instruction with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cognition and Instruction more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025