CNS Drug Reviews

271 papers and 12.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 271 papers published in CNS Drug Reviews in the last decades have received a total of 12.5k indexed citations. Papers published in CNS Drug Reviews usually cover Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (147 papers), Molecular Biology (133 papers) and Pharmacology (72 papers) specifically the topics of Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (93 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (54 papers) and Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (43 papers). The most active scholars publishing in CNS Drug Reviews are Bengt Winblad, Sean Lilienfeld, Esa Leìnonen, Sami Anttila, Bo Jensen, Udo Bonnet, James A. Bourne, Izyaslav P. Lapin, Michael A. Rogawski and Gary L. Wenk.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in CNS Drug Reviews

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in CNS Drug Reviews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in CNS Drug Reviews.

Countries where authors publish in CNS Drug Reviews

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in CNS Drug Reviews. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in CNS Drug Reviews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites CNS Drug Reviews more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025