Daniel Williams

19 papers receiving 193 citations

Peers

Daniel Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Classics 14
  • Geography, Planning and Development 14
  • Literature and Literary Theory 26
  • Physiology 61
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 34
Replace Jack D. Pressman with:
Jack D. Pressman United States
Jesse F. Ballenger United States
Teresa Monreal United States
Beth J. Singer United States
Sara Pisani United Kingdom
John P. Vuchetich United States
Axel Hoffer United States
Ronald P. Salkeld United States
Lauren E. Hartstein United States
Jennifer R. Sadler United States
Daniel Williams relative to Jack D. Pressman United States Jack D. Pressman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
Jack D. Pressman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Williams. The network helps show where Daniel Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Williams Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Williams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199575
2 201740
3 198133
4 197525
5
England in the fifteenth century : proceedings of the 1986 Harlaxton Symposium
198720
6 201214
7 202010
8 19687
9 20174
10 19954
11 19843
12 20183
13
Hearing conservation measures of effectiveness across the Department of Defense.
20202
14 20162
15 20152
16 20172
17 20011
18 19881
19 20181
20 20250

About Daniel Williams

Daniel Williams is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Philosophy, Speech and Hearing, Sociology and Political Science and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 21 papers that have together received 249 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Noise Effects and Management (3 papers), Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature (3 papers), South African History and Culture (2 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (2 papers), Body Composition Measurement Techniques (1 paper), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (1 paper), Nutritional Studies and Diet (1 paper) and Walter Benjamin Studies Compilation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (14 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (14 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (26 citations), Physiology (61 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (34 citations). Daniel Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Timothy G. Lohman, Scott B. Going, Stuart C. Yudofsky, C. Neu, Alberto DiMascio, Richard H. Wilson, Marvin Chester, Brian K. Jones, Elizabeth A. McKenna and Laurie Stevens. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Psychiatry, Nineteenth Century Contexts, Toxics, Victorian poetry and Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact