Daniel Williams

19 papers receiving 198 citations

Peers

Daniel Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
  • Classics 14
  • Geography, Planning and Development 14
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 32
  • Literature and Literary Theory 26
  • Physiology 51
Replace Jack D. Pressman with:
Jack D. Pressman United States
Thomas Ots Germany
Emily Williams Kelly United States
Adam Crabtree United States
Mark Pearson United Kingdom
Jesse F. Ballenger United States
Jürgen Dittmann Germany
John P. Vuchetich United States
Teresa Monreal United States
Christophe Gauld France
Daniel Williams relative to Jack D. Pressman United States Jack D. Pressman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
Jack D. Pressman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Williams. The network helps show where Daniel Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Williams Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Williams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199577
2 201740
3 198133
4 197525
5
England in the fifteenth century : proceedings of the 1986 Harlaxton Symposium
198720
6 201217
7 202010
8 19687
9 20174
10 19954
11 19843
12 20183
13 20152
14 20172
15
Hearing conservation measures of effectiveness across the Department of Defense.
20202
16 20162
17 20011
18 20181
19 19881
20 20250

About Daniel Williams

Daniel Williams is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience and Speech and Hearing, having authored 21 papers that have together received 254 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature (3 papers), Noise Effects and Management (2 papers), South African History and Culture (2 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (2 papers), Body Composition Measurement Techniques (1 paper), Green IT and Sustainability (1 paper), Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics (1 paper) and Superconducting Materials and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (14 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (14 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (32 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (26 citations) and Physiology (51 citations). Daniel Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Scott B. Going, Timothy G. Lohman, Stuart C. Yudofsky, C. Neu, Alberto DiMascio, Richard H. Wilson, Marvin Chester, Brian K. Jones, Elizabeth A. McKenna and H. J. Borchers. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Psychiatry, Nineteenth Century Contexts, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, Review of Scientific Instruments and ELH.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact