This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Childhood. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Childhood with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Childhood more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Childhood. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Childhood.
About Childhood
The 1.0k papers published in Childhood in the last decades have received a total of 28.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Childhood usually cover Safety Research (229 papers), Sociology and Political Science (721 papers), Education (385 papers), Gender Studies (110 papers) and Clinical Psychology (126 papers) specifically the topics of Children's Rights and Participation (489 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (251 papers), Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare (135 papers), Youth Education and Societal Dynamics (114 papers), Child Welfare and Adoption (69 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (60 papers), Participatory Visual Research Methods (56 papers) and Child Development and Digital Technology (50 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Childhood are Samantha Punch, Spyros Spyrou, Kim Rasmussen, Malcolm Hill, Michael Wyness, Pia Christensen, Alan Prout, Sonja C. Grover, Laura Lundy and Marc Jans.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.