Applied Developmental Science

687 papers and 25.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 687 papers published in Applied Developmental Science in the last decades have received a total of 25.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Applied Developmental Science usually cover Education (330 papers), Safety Research (251 papers) and Clinical Psychology (219 papers) specifically the topics of Early Childhood Education and Development (248 papers), Youth Development and Social Support (231 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (133 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Applied Developmental Science are Judith Torney‐Purta, Peter Benson, Michael Windle, Jeanne Brooks‐Gunn, Peter C. Scales, Jodie L. Roth, Shepherd Zeldin, Michael E. Lamb, Margaret Burchinal and Richard M. Clifford.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Applied Developmental Science

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Applied Developmental Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Applied Developmental Science.

Countries where authors publish in Applied Developmental Science

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Applied Developmental Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Applied Developmental Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Applied Developmental Science more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025