Cardiovascular Drug Reviews

459 papers and 11.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 459 papers published in Cardiovascular Drug Reviews in the last decades have received a total of 11.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Cardiovascular Drug Reviews usually cover Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (239 papers), Molecular Biology (188 papers) and Pharmacology (56 papers) specifically the topics of Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (112 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (66 papers) and Ion channel regulation and function (58 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cardiovascular Drug Reviews are Kailash Prasad, Silvia Bradamante, Alessandro Villa, Livia Barenghi, Amanda Lochner, Johan A. Moolman, Csaba Szabó, Ruitang Deng, Pál Pacher and John D. Imig.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Cardiovascular Drug Reviews

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Cardiovascular Drug Reviews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cardiovascular Drug Reviews.

Countries where authors publish in Cardiovascular Drug Reviews

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cardiovascular Drug Reviews. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cardiovascular Drug Reviews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cardiovascular Drug Reviews more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025