Regenerative Biomaterials

737 papers and 14.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 737 papers published in Regenerative Biomaterials in the last decades have received a total of 14.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Regenerative Biomaterials usually cover Biomedical Engineering (381 papers), Biomaterials (286 papers) and Surgery (222 papers) specifically the topics of Bone Tissue Engineering Materials (224 papers), Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications (146 papers) and 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (86 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Regenerative Biomaterials are Nicholas A. Peppas, Wenjiang Ding, Yubo Fan, Jiandong Ding, Gary L. Bowlin, Allison E. Fetz, Marko Radic, Lidy E. Fratila‐Apachitei, Amir A. Zadpoor and Xiaoming Li.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Regenerative Biomaterials

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Regenerative Biomaterials. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Regenerative Biomaterials.

Countries where authors publish in Regenerative Biomaterials

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Regenerative Biomaterials. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Regenerative Biomaterials with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Regenerative Biomaterials more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025