Birth Defects Research Part C Embryo Today Reviews · 1×
×4.06k/1kSURGE
×2.0631/313EDM
×1.1177/167EAS
×0.4704/2kGENET
×0.2309/1kHTM
Citations per year
'16
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24
'25
'26
Countries where authors publish in Islets
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Islets. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Islets with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Islets more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Islets. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Islets.
About Islets
The 416 papers published in Islets in the last decades have received a total of 9.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Islets usually cover Surgery (386 papers), Physiology (6 papers), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (12 papers), Genetics (19 papers) and Sensory Systems (3 papers) specifically the topics of Pancreatic function and diabetes (384 papers), Diabetes and associated disorders (17 papers), Diabetes Management and Research (6 papers), Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances (6 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (5 papers), Calcium signaling and nucleotide metabolism (5 papers), Diabetes Treatment and Management (4 papers) and Autophagy in Disease and Therapy (4 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Islets are Manami Hara, Pieter In 'T Veld, Abraham Kim, Kevin W. P. Miller, Marjan Slak Rupnik, Jurij Dolenšek, Andraž Stožer, Donald J. Steiner, Guy A. Rutter and German Kilimnik.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.