Human Fertility

1.1k papers and 12.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.1k papers published in Human Fertility in the last decades have received a total of 12.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Human Fertility usually cover Reproductive Medicine (780 papers), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (497 papers) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (459 papers) specifically the topics of Reproductive Health and Technologies (460 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (411 papers) and Reproductive Biology and Fertility (352 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Human Fertility are James Trussell, Marilyn Crawshaw, Adam Balen, Marcus Pembrey, Allan Pacey, Lone Schmidt, Daniel R. Brison, L. Sekhon, Ashok Agarwal and Richard A. Anderson.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Human Fertility

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Human Fertility. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Human Fertility.

Countries where authors publish in Human Fertility

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Human Fertility. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Human Fertility with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Human Fertility more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025