Information Processing & Management

174.0k citations
5.3k papers · · active since 2016

Impact in

    • Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
    • Web Data Mining and Analysis
    • Topic Modeling
    • Advanced Text Analysis Techniques
    • Natural Language Processing Techniques
    • Semantic Web and Ontologies
    • Text and Document Classification Technologies
    • Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining

Papers in

    • Topic Modeling 962
    • Advanced Text Analysis Techniques 596
    • Natural Language Processing Techniques 559
    • Semantic Web and Ontologies 427
    • Text and Document Classification Technologies 314
    • Information Retrieval and Search Behavior 653
    • Web Data Mining and Analysis 337
    • Recommender Systems and Techniques 303

Information Processing & Management

4.5k papers receiving 152.9k citations

Peers

Information Processing & Management
Comparison fields: 5 of 245
  • Information Systems 60.5k
  • Artificial Intelligence 79.4k
  • Library and Information Sciences 2.6k
  • Information Systems and Management 10.1k
  • Communication 9.6k
Replace Psychological Review with:
Psychological Review United States
Psychological Bulletin United States
Frontiers in Psychology China
Journal of Information Science United Kingdom
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology United States
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies United States
Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews United States
International Journal of Information Management United Kingdom
Computer United States
American Psychologist United States
Information Processing & Management relative to Psychological Review United States Psychological Review's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15.8×
Psychological Review · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Information Processing & Management

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Information Processing & Management. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Information Processing & Management with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Information Processing & Management more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Information Processing & Management

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Information Processing & Management. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Information Processing & Management.

About Information Processing & Management

The 5.3k papers published in Information Processing & Management in the last decades have received a total of 174.0k indexed citations . Papers published in Information Processing & Management usually cover Artificial Intelligence (2.6k papers), Information Systems (1.8k papers), Library and Information Sciences (97 papers), Signal Processing (395 papers) and Communication (230 papers) specifically the topics of Topic Modeling (962 papers), Information Retrieval and Search Behavior (653 papers), Advanced Text Analysis Techniques (596 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (559 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (427 papers), Web Data Mining and Analysis (337 papers), Text and Document Classification Technologies (314 papers) and Recommender Systems and Techniques (303 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Information Processing & Management are Martin C. Dillon, Gerard Salton, Chris Buckley, Guy Lapalme, Marina V. Sokolova, Amanda Spink, Bernard J. Jim Jansen, Abraham Bookstein, Akiko Aizawa and Ellen M. Voorhees.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact