Countries where authors publish in Brain Connectivity
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Brain Connectivity. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Brain Connectivity with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brain Connectivity more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Brain Connectivity. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Brain Connectivity.
About Brain Connectivity
The 824 papers published in Brain Connectivity in the last decades have received a total of 30.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Brain Connectivity usually cover Cognitive Neuroscience (660 papers), Neurology (44 papers), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (114 papers), Psychiatry and Mental health (61 papers) and Sensory Systems (9 papers) specifically the topics of Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (580 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (94 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (39 papers), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (36 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (22 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (21 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (20 papers) and Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (18 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Brain Connectivity are Karl John Friston, Susan L. Whitfield, Alfonso Nieto-Castañón, Marcus E. Raichle, Robert W. Cox, Gang Chen, Anthony G. Hudetz, Saâd Jbabdi, Heidi Johansen‐Berg and Paul A. Taylor.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.