Somatosensory & Motor Research

942 papers and 19.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 942 papers published in Somatosensory & Motor Research in the last decades have received a total of 19.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Somatosensory & Motor Research usually cover Cognitive Neuroscience (436 papers), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (223 papers) and Physiology (168 papers) specifically the topics of Tactile and Sensory Interactions (171 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (149 papers) and Motor Control and Adaptation (140 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Somatosensory & Motor Research are Stanley J. Bolanowski, Daniel J. Simons, Barry G. Green, Joseph C. Stevens, Ronald T. Verrillo, Jon H. Kaas, George A. Gescheider, Mark Hollins, Joel D. Greenspan and H. Burton.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Somatosensory & Motor Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Somatosensory & Motor Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Somatosensory & Motor Research.

Countries where authors publish in Somatosensory & Motor Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Somatosensory & Motor Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Somatosensory & Motor Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Somatosensory & Motor Research more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025