British Journal of Music Education

811 papers and 7.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 811 papers published in British Journal of Music Education in the last decades have received a total of 7.9k indexed citations. Papers published in British Journal of Music Education usually cover Music (728 papers), Cognitive Neuroscience (363 papers) and Education (301 papers) specifically the topics of Diverse Music Education Insights (705 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (352 papers) and Music Therapy and Health (110 papers). The most active scholars publishing in British Journal of Music Education are Susan Hallam, Janet Mills, Göran Folkestad, Keith Swanwick, Harald Jørgensen, David J. Hargreaves, Sarah Hennessy, Siw Graabræk Nielsen, Pamela Burnard and Tim Cain.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in British Journal of Music Education

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in British Journal of Music Education. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in British Journal of Music Education.

Countries where authors publish in British Journal of Music Education

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in British Journal of Music Education. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in British Journal of Music Education with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites British Journal of Music Education more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025