Journal of Music Teacher Education

484 papers and 3.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 484 papers published in Journal of Music Teacher Education in the last decades have received a total of 3.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Music Teacher Education usually cover Music (362 papers), Education (286 papers) and Cognitive Neuroscience (68 papers) specifically the topics of Diverse Music Education Insights (361 papers), Music Education and Analysis (117 papers) and Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (103 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Music Teacher Education are Colleen Conway, William I. Bauer, Kristen Pellegrino, Edward P. Asmus, Steven N. Kelly, Nancy H. Barry, Margaret H. Berg, Phillip M. Hash, Sean Robert Powell and Kimberly VanWeelden.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Music Teacher Education

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Music Teacher Education. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Music Teacher Education.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Music Teacher Education

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Music Teacher Education. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Music Teacher Education with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Music Teacher Education more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025