Chinese Journal of Natural Medicines

2.3k papers and 26.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.3k papers published in Chinese Journal of Natural Medicines in the last decades have received a total of 26.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Chinese Journal of Natural Medicines usually cover Molecular Biology (1.2k papers), Plant Science (584 papers) and Pharmacology (450 papers) specifically the topics of Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (506 papers), Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (370 papers) and Traditional Chinese Medicine Analysis (220 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Chinese Journal of Natural Medicines are Shao Li, Bo Zhang, Bo Zhang, Boyang Yu, Luyong Zhang, Ziyi Wang, Jiahui Zheng, Xin Wang, Luping Qin and Jingyu Liang.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Chinese Journal of Natural Medicines

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Chinese Journal of Natural Medicines. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Chinese Journal of Natural Medicines.

Countries where authors publish in Chinese Journal of Natural Medicines

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Chinese Journal of Natural Medicines. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Chinese Journal of Natural Medicines with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chinese Journal of Natural Medicines more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025