Biotechnic & Histochemistry

1.7k papers and 21.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.7k papers published in Biotechnic & Histochemistry in the last decades have received a total of 21.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Biotechnic & Histochemistry usually cover Molecular Biology (667 papers), Pharmacology (167 papers) and Plant Science (142 papers) specifically the topics of Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications (194 papers), Biological Stains and Phytochemicals (105 papers) and Sperm and Testicular Function (41 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Biotechnic & Histochemistry are Jan Kapuściński, RW Horobin, Mark Wainwright, Richard W. Dapson, Akio Kato, Carol A. Peterson, Mark Brundrett, Bryce Kendrick, J. A. Kiernan and Helen E. Gruber.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Biotechnic & Histochemistry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Biotechnic & Histochemistry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Biotechnic & Histochemistry.

Countries where authors publish in Biotechnic & Histochemistry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Biotechnic & Histochemistry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Biotechnic & Histochemistry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Biotechnic & Histochemistry more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025