Armed Forces & Society

1.6k papers and 14.8k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 1.6k papers published in Armed Forces & Society in the last decades have received a total of 14.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Armed Forces & Society usually cover Political Science and International Relations (737 papers), Sociology and Political Science (654 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (425 papers) specifically the topics of Defense, Military, and Policy Studies (391 papers), Military History and Strategy (338 papers) and Gender, Security, and Conflict (241 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Armed Forces & Society are Mady Wechsler Segal, Charles C. Moskos, James Griffith, Peter D. Feaver, James Burk, Guy L. Siebold, David R. Segal, Anthony King, Eyal Ben‐Ari and Morris Janowitz.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Armed Forces & Society

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Armed Forces & Society. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Armed Forces & Society.

Countries where authors publish in Armed Forces & Society

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Armed Forces & Society. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Armed Forces & Society with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Armed Forces & Society more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026