Peter D. Feaver

5.3k citations
68 papers · 3.2k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

Peter D. Feaver

62 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Peers

Peter D. Feaver
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Political Science and International Relations 2.3k
  • Sociology and Political Science 1.9k
  • Development 153
  • Gender Studies 335
  • Communication 181
Replace Christopher Gelpi with:
Christopher Gelpi United States
Scott Sigmund Gartner United States
Richard C. Eichenberg United States
Dan Reiter United States
Joshua D. Kertzer United States
Anna Leander Denmark
Nancy Bermeo United States
Henry E. Hale United States
Ellen Lust United States
Amanda Murdie United States
Peter D. Feaver relative to Christopher Gelpi United States Christopher Gelpi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.3×
Christopher Gelpi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter D. Feaver

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter D. Feaver's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter D. Feaver with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter D. Feaver more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter D. Feaver

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter D. Feaver. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter D. Feaver. The network helps show where Peter D. Feaver may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter D. Feaver, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter D. Feaver Line = papers co-authored together Peter D. Feaver links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 68 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006262
2 2006246
3 2009239
4 1996237
5 2003223
6 1999217
7 2003200
8 2004195
9 2002139
10 2011137
11 2005137
12 2002103
13 201175
14 201770
15 200767
16 199258
17 200052
18 199749
19
Guarding the guardians
199245
20 199842

About Peter D. Feaver

Peter D. Feaver is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality and Strategy and Management, having authored 68 papers that have together received 3.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include International Relations and Foreign Policy (18 papers), Nuclear Issues and Defense (14 papers), Defense, Military, and Policy Studies (13 papers), Military and Defense Studies (10 papers), Military History and Strategy (8 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (6 papers), Political Conflict and Governance (6 papers) and Nuclear and radioactivity studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (2.3k citations), Sociology and Political Science (1.9k citations), Development (153 citations), Gender Studies (335 citations) and Communication (181 citations). Peter D. Feaver has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Iran and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Christopher Gelpi, Jason Reifler, Lawrence Freedman, Richard H. Kohn, John H. Aldrich, Andrew J. Bacevich, Joseph M. Grieco, Hal Brands, Eliot A. Cohen and Scott D. Sagan. Their work appears in journals such as Armed Forces & Society, International Security, Foreign Affairs, Security Studies and Journal of Strategic Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact