This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Analysis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Analysis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Analysis more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Analysis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Analysis.
About Analysis
The 837 papers published in Analysis in the last decades have received a total of 7.0k indexed citations . Papers published in Analysis usually cover Applied Mathematics (427 papers), Numerical Analysis (116 papers), Mathematical Physics (187 papers), Geometry and Topology (143 papers) and Algebra and Number Theory (68 papers) specifically the topics of Differential Equations and Boundary Problems (88 papers), Approximation Theory and Sequence Spaces (80 papers), Mathematical functions and polynomials (71 papers), Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering (71 papers), Holomorphic and Operator Theory (69 papers), Differential Equations and Numerical Methods (54 papers), Meromorphic and Entire Functions (52 papers) and Geometric Analysis and Curvature Flows (49 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Analysis are J. A. Fridy, Jeff Connor, Ruhan Zhao, Ferenc Móricz, Wolfgang Lüh, Feng Qi, Matti Jutila, Harry I. Miller, Hermann Sohr and Werner Kratz.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.