Countries where authors publish in Analysis Mathematica
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Analysis Mathematica. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Analysis Mathematica with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Analysis Mathematica more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Analysis Mathematica
This network shows the impact of papers published in Analysis Mathematica. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Analysis Mathematica.
About Analysis Mathematica
The 912 papers published in Analysis Mathematica in the last decades have received a total of 6.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Analysis Mathematica usually cover Applied Mathematics (691 papers), Numerical Analysis (221 papers), Mathematical Physics (313 papers), Statistics and Probability (179 papers) and Geometry and Topology (136 papers) specifically the topics of Advanced Harmonic Analysis Research (267 papers), Differential Equations and Boundary Problems (236 papers), Mathematical Approximation and Integration (177 papers), Approximation Theory and Sequence Spaces (172 papers), Holomorphic and Operator Theory (130 papers), Mathematical Analysis and Transform Methods (111 papers), Mathematical functions and polynomials (107 papers) and advanced mathematical theories (104 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Analysis Mathematica are P. Túrán, Stefan Samko, Л. Леиндлер, Ferenc Móricz, Mitsuo Izuki, Ferenc Weisz, Вилмос Тотик, Ferenc Schipp, Б. И. Голубов and S. Sivasubramanian.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.