Atmospheric measurement techniques

4.5k papers and 101.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 4.5k papers published in Atmospheric measurement techniques in the last decades have received a total of 101.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Atmospheric measurement techniques usually cover Atmospheric Science (3.9k papers), Global and Planetary Change (3.1k papers) and Environmental Engineering (703 papers) specifically the topics of Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols (2.5k papers), Atmospheric Ozone and Climate (2.1k papers) and Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics (1.7k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Atmospheric measurement techniques are L. A. Remer, R. C. Levy, S. Mattoo, John P. Burrows, L. A. Munchak, A. M. Sayer, Joanna Joiner, N. Christina Hsu, Falguni Patadia and Alexei Lyapustin.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Atmospheric measurement techniques

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Atmospheric measurement techniques. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Atmospheric measurement techniques.

Countries where authors publish in Atmospheric measurement techniques

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Atmospheric measurement techniques. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Atmospheric measurement techniques with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Atmospheric measurement techniques more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025