American Journal of Mathematics

3.6k papers and 106.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.6k papers published in American Journal of Mathematics in the last decades have received a total of 106.4k indexed citations. Papers published in American Journal of Mathematics usually cover Geometry and Topology (1.8k papers), Mathematical Physics (1.8k papers) and Applied Mathematics (1.1k papers) specifically the topics of Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (803 papers), Advanced Algebra and Geometry (733 papers) and Advanced Topics in Algebra (487 papers). The most active scholars publishing in American Journal of Mathematics are Lester E. Dubins, Harish-chandra Harish-Chandra, Jun-ichi Igusa, Leonard Gross, Bertram Kostant, Rufus Bowen, Terence Tao, Philip Hartman, Aurel Wintner and John C. Nash.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in American Journal of Mathematics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in American Journal of Mathematics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in American Journal of Mathematics.

Countries where authors publish in American Journal of Mathematics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in American Journal of Mathematics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in American Journal of Mathematics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites American Journal of Mathematics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025