Clinics in Chest Medicine

2.5k papers and 71.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.5k papers published in Clinics in Chest Medicine in the last decades have received a total of 71.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Clinics in Chest Medicine usually cover Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (1.5k papers), Epidemiology (496 papers) and Physiology (466 papers) specifically the topics of Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (355 papers), Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (282 papers) and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (269 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Clinics in Chest Medicine are Charles S. Dela Cruz, William D. Travis, Richard A. Matthay, L.T. Tanoue, Brett C. Bade, Joseph O. Falkinham, Joseph F. Tomashefski, Theodore K. Marras, Richard W. Light and Peter J. Barnes.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Clinics in Chest Medicine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Clinics in Chest Medicine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Clinics in Chest Medicine.

Countries where authors publish in Clinics in Chest Medicine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Clinics in Chest Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Clinics in Chest Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinics in Chest Medicine more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025