AJP Advances in Physiology Education

39.9k citations
2.1k papers · · active since 2016

Impact in

  • Education top 2%
    • Innovative Teaching Methods
    • Problem and Project Based Learning
    • Online and Blended Learning
    • Education and Critical Thinking Development
    • Evaluation of Teaching Practices

Papers in

    • Innovative Teaching Methods 599
    • Problem and Project Based Learning 217
    • Education and Critical Thinking Development 157
    • Science Education and Pedagogy 123
    • Evaluation of Teaching Practices 98

AJP Advances in Physiology Education

1.8k papers receiving 36.1k citations

Peers

AJP Advances in Physiology Education
Comparison fields: 5 of 235
  • Education 15.4k
  • Family Practice 802
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 4.5k
  • General Dentistry 328
  • Computer Science Applications 1.3k
Replace Advances in Health Sciences Education with:
Advances in Health Sciences Education Canada
Personnel Psychology United States
Psychological Methods United States
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes United States
CBE—Life Sciences Education United States
Systematic Reviews United Kingdom
International Journal of Qualitative Methods Canada
International Journal of Social Research Methodology United Kingdom
Higher Education Research & Development Australia
Educational Research Review United States
AJP Advances in Physiology Education relative to Advances in Health Sciences Education Canada Advances in Health Sciences Education's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Advances in Health Sciences Education · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in AJP Advances in Physiology Education

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in AJP Advances in Physiology Education. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in AJP Advances in Physiology Education with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites AJP Advances in Physiology Education more than expected).

Fields of papers published in AJP Advances in Physiology Education

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in AJP Advances in Physiology Education. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in AJP Advances in Physiology Education.

About AJP Advances in Physiology Education

The 2.1k papers published in AJP Advances in Physiology Education in the last decades have received a total of 39.9k indexed citations . Papers published in AJP Advances in Physiology Education usually cover Family Practice (68 papers), Education (966 papers), Developmental and Educational Psychology (210 papers), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (378 papers) and Health Informatics (19 papers) specifically the topics of Innovative Teaching Methods (599 papers), Biomedical and Engineering Education (327 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (317 papers), Problem and Project Based Learning (217 papers), Education and Critical Thinking Development (157 papers), Science Education and Pedagogy (123 papers), Experimental Learning in Engineering (105 papers) and Evaluation of Teaching Practices (98 papers). The most active scholars publishing in AJP Advances in Physiology Education are JOEL A. MICHAEL, Stephen E. DiCarlo, Douglas Curran‐Everett, Heidi L. Lujan, Robert Clinton Webb, Huiyun Liang, Walter F. Ward, John L. Dobson, Barbara Eason Goodman and Jonathan D. Kibble.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact