North Carolina State University

115.4k papers receiving 3.9M citations

Peers

North Carolina State University
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Plant Science 459.7k
  • Biomaterials 139.1k
  • Biomedical Engineering 407.5k
  • Polymers and Plastics 129.8k
  • Insect Science 111.9k
Replace University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill with:
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill United States
Duke University United States
Virginia Tech United States
University of Maryland, College Park United States
Pennsylvania State University United States
Johns Hopkins University United States
The Ohio State University United States
University of Tennessee at Knoxville United States
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey United States
University of Pennsylvania United States
North Carolina State University relative to University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill United States University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at North Carolina State University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at North Carolina State University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at North Carolina State University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites North Carolina State University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at North Carolina State University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with North Carolina State University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with North Carolina State University at the time of their publication.

About North Carolina State University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with North Carolina State University have published 125.4k papers, which have received a total of 4.1M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 13.1k papers in Plant Science, 3.2k papers in Animal Science and Zoology, 2.2k papers in Small Animals, 477 papers in Equine and 3.5k papers in Insect Science on the topics of Semiconductor materials and devices (2.7k papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (1.8k papers), Plant and animal studies (1.6k papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (1.5k papers), Silicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies (1.3k papers), GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials (1.2k papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (1.2k papers) and Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (1.1k papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Plant Science (459.7k citations), Biomaterials (139.1k citations), Biomedical Engineering (407.5k citations), Polymers and Plastics (129.8k citations) and Insect Science (111.9k citations). Authors at North Carolina State University collaborate with scholars in United States, China and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Applied Physics Letters, Poultry Science, Crop Science, Journal of Animal Science and Journal of Applied Physics. Some of North Carolina State University's most productive authors include Marie Davidian, David A. Dickey, C. Clark Cockerham, B. S. Weir, Todd R. Klaenhammer, Anthony L. Andrady, Wayne A. Fuller, B. Jayant Baliga, Michael D. Dickey and J. Narayan.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact