Tulane University

2.3M citations
56.1k papers ·

Impact in

  • Virology top 0.5%
    • HIV Research and Treatment
  • Genetics top 0.5%
    • Mesenchymal stem cell research

Papers in

Tulane University

53.3k papers receiving 2.2M citations

Peers

Tulane University
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Virology 36.3k
  • Genetics 43.3k
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 97.2k
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 63.1k
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 119.9k
Replace Louisiana State University with:
Louisiana State University United States
Vanderbilt University United States
University of Florida United States
University of Alabama at Birmingham United States
Emory University United States
University of Alabama United States
Texas A&M University United States
Washington University in St. Louis United States
The University of Texas at Austin United States
University of Kentucky United States
Tulane University relative to Louisiana State University United States Louisiana State University's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.0×
Louisiana State University · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Tulane University

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Tulane University. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Tulane University with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tulane University more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Tulane University

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Tulane University at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Tulane University at the time of their publication.

About Tulane University

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Tulane University have published 56.1k papers, which have received a total of 2.3M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 860 papers in Virology, 2.7k papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, 1.7k papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, 1.7k papers in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and 1.8k papers in Infectious Diseases on the topics of Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (1.2k papers), HIV Research and Treatment (824 papers), Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (692 papers), Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones (641 papers), Renin-Angiotensin System Studies (580 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (528 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (515 papers) and Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors (486 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Virology (36.3k citations), Genetics (43.3k citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (97.2k citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (63.1k citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (119.9k citations). Authors at Tulane University collaborate with scholars in United States, China and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, The Journal of Urology, Peptides, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Endocrinology. Some of Tulane University's most productive authors include John P. Perdew, Matthias Ernzerhof, Ulrike Diebold, Andrew Victor Schally, Jiang He, Abba J. Kastin, Paul Kieran Whelton, Mel Levy, Akira Arimura and Darwin J. Prockop.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact