Université Pierre Mendès France

41.7k citations
1.9k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Université Pierre Mendès France

1.6k papers receiving 39.5k citations

Peers

Université Pierre Mendès France
Comparison fields: 5 of 248
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 5.8k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 7.9k
  • Statistics and Probability 2.4k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 3.7k
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 2.0k
Replace Rütgers (Germany) with:
Rütgers (Germany) Germany
Institut für Urheber- und Medienrecht Germany
Transnational University Limburg Netherlands
Centre de Gestion Scientifique France
University of Erfurt Germany
Research Foundation - Flanders Belgium
Victoria School of Management Switzerland
European University of Rome Italy
Universities UK United Kingdom
Amsterdam University of the Arts Netherlands
Université Pierre Mendès France relative to Rütgers (Germany) Germany Rütgers (Germany)'s profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Rütgers (Germany) · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Université Pierre Mendès France

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Université Pierre Mendès France. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Université Pierre Mendès France with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Université Pierre Mendès France more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Université Pierre Mendès France

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Université Pierre Mendès France at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Université Pierre Mendès France at the time of their publication.

About Université Pierre Mendès France

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Université Pierre Mendès France have published 1.9k papers, which have received a total of 41.7k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 270 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 146 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 139 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 63 papers in Urban Studies and 48 papers in Linguistics and Language on the topics of French Urban and Social Studies (98 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (71 papers), Education, sociology, and vocational training (70 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (69 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (67 papers), Linguistics and Discourse Analysis (62 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (52 papers) and Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (48 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Developmental and Educational Psychology (5.8k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (7.9k citations), Statistics and Probability (2.4k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (3.7k citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (2.0k citations). Authors at Université Pierre Mendès France collaborate with scholars in France, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Research Policy, PLoS ONE, Sociologie du Travail, Perception and European Journal of Psychology of Education. Some of Université Pierre Mendès France's most productive authors include Sylviane Valdois, Pier Paolo Saviotti, Vincent Mangematin, Marie‐Line Bosse, Monica Baciu, Marie‐Josèphe Tainturier, J-M Piau, Édouard Gentaz, Andreas Pyka and Sonia Kandel.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact