Institut für Urheber- und Medienrecht

69.1k citations
1.9k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Institut für Urheber- und Medienrecht

1.6k papers receiving 63.0k citations

Peers

Institut für Urheber- und Medienrecht
Comparison fields: 5 of 244
  • General Decision Sciences 2.5k
  • Safety Research 7.8k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 6.5k
  • Applied Psychology 1.8k
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 4.8k
Replace University of Erfurt with:
University of Erfurt Germany
Rütgers (Germany) Germany
Munich School of Philosophy Germany
Technische Hochschule Mannheim Germany
Amsterdam University of the Arts Netherlands
Université Pierre Mendès France France
Transnational University Limburg Netherlands
Zurich University of Applied Sciences in Business Administration Switzerland
European University of Rome Italy
Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History Germany
Institut für Urheber- und Medienrecht relative to University of Erfurt Germany University of Erfurt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
University of Erfurt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Institut für Urheber- und Medienrecht

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Institut für Urheber- und Medienrecht. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Institut für Urheber- und Medienrecht with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Institut für Urheber- und Medienrecht more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Institut für Urheber- und Medienrecht

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Institut für Urheber- und Medienrecht at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Institut für Urheber- und Medienrecht at the time of their publication.

About Institut für Urheber- und Medienrecht

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Institut für Urheber- und Medienrecht have published 1.9k papers, which have received a total of 69.1k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 105 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 45 papers in Human-Computer Interaction, 14 papers in General Decision Sciences, 200 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 53 papers in Statistics and Probability on the topics of Data Management and Algorithms (54 papers), Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (42 papers), Advanced Database Systems and Queries (38 papers), Interactive and Immersive Displays (34 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (34 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (32 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (28 papers) and Global trade and economics (24 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on General Decision Sciences (2.5k citations), Safety Research (7.8k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (6.5k citations), Applied Psychology (1.8k citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (4.8k citations). Authors at Institut für Urheber- und Medienrecht collaborate with scholars in Germany, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, The Economic Journal, European Radiology, Drugs and Advances in experimental medicine and biology. Some of Institut für Urheber- und Medienrecht's most productive authors include Klaus M. Schmidt, Ernst Fehr, Ulrich Beck, Reinhard Pekrun, Sascha O. Becker, Andrea Ichino, Thomas Goetz, Alexander Renkl, Veronika Brandstätter and Hans‐Peter Kriegel.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact