Sociologie du Travail

1.9k papers and 13.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.9k papers published in Sociologie du Travail in the last decades have received a total of 13.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Sociologie du Travail usually cover Sociology and Political Science (1.2k papers), Urban Studies (567 papers) and General Health Professions (258 papers) specifically the topics of French Urban and Social Studies (616 papers), Sociology of Public Action and Professional Practices (570 papers) and Social Sciences and Governance (540 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Sociologie du Travail are Lucien Karpik, Joan Acker, Emmanuel Lazega, Catherine Paradeise, Bruno Latour, Franck Cochoy, Jean-Marc Weller, Dominique Lorrain, Valérie Boussard and Marie Buscatto.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Sociologie du Travail

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Sociologie du Travail. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Sociologie du Travail.

Countries where authors publish in Sociologie du Travail

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Sociologie du Travail. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Sociologie du Travail with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sociologie du Travail more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025