Universidad Popular Autónoma del Estado de Puebla
Impact in
Papers in
-
- Organizational Management and Innovation 41
- Top scholars
- Mariano RojasJudith Cavazos‐ArroyoSantiago‐Omar Caballero‐MoralesRogelio Puente‐DíazJosé Luis Martínez FloresMartha Leticia Gaeta GonzálezJoseph VarónElena Soto‐Vega
- Journals
- Sustainability (21 papers)Plant Disease (10 papers)Applied Sciences (10 papers)Blood (10 papers)Frontiers in Psychology (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- MexicoSpainUnited States
In The Last Decade
Universidad Popular Autónoma del Estado de Puebla
1.5k papers receiving 11.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 237
- Business and International Management 160
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 612
- Management Information Systems 490
- Strategy and Management 805
- Social Psychology 992
Countries citing scholars working at Universidad Popular Autónoma del Estado de Puebla
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Universidad Popular Autónoma del Estado de Puebla. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Universidad Popular Autónoma del Estado de Puebla with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Universidad Popular Autónoma del Estado de Puebla more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Universidad Popular Autónoma del Estado de Puebla
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Universidad Popular Autónoma del Estado de Puebla at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Universidad Popular Autónoma del Estado de Puebla at the time of their publication.
About Universidad Popular Autónoma del Estado de Puebla
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Universidad Popular Autónoma del Estado de Puebla have published 1.9k papers, which have received a total of 12.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 150 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, 21 papers in Business and International Management, 220 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 26 papers in General Social Sciences and 45 papers in Computer Science Applications on the topics of Business, Innovation, and Economy (146 papers), Educational Innovations and Technology (61 papers), Diverse Applied Research Studies (60 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (52 papers), Education and Teacher Training (50 papers), Stress and Burnout Research (41 papers), Educational Outcomes and Influences (41 papers) and Organizational Management and Innovation (41 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Business and International Management (160 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (612 citations), Management Information Systems (490 citations), Strategy and Management (805 citations) and Social Psychology (992 citations). Authors at Universidad Popular Autónoma del Estado de Puebla collaborate with scholars in Mexico, Spain and United States and have published in prestigious journals including Sustainability, Plant Disease, Applied Sciences, Blood and Frontiers in Psychology. Some of Universidad Popular Autónoma del Estado de Puebla's most productive authors include Mariano Rojas, Judith Cavazos‐Arroyo, Santiago‐Omar Caballero‐Morales, Rogelio Puente‐Díaz, José Luis Martínez Flores, Martha Leticia Gaeta González, Joseph Varón, Elena Soto‐Vega, Guillermo J. Ruíz‐Argüelles and Luis Chavez.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.