Texas A&M University-Victoria

28.0k citations
1.2k papers ·

Impact in

Papers in

Texas A&M University-Victoria

1.0k papers receiving 26.4k citations

Peers

Texas A&M University-Victoria
Comparison fields: 5 of 239
  • Information Systems and Management 4.5k
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 3.6k
  • Marketing 2.3k
  • Strategy and Management 3.8k
  • Communication 1.3k
Replace Huntsman (United States) with:
Huntsman (United States) United States
University of Dallas United States
St. Mary's University, Texas United States
University of North Texas at Dallas United States
Nicholls State University United States
Abilene Christian University United States
Emporia State University United States
University of Central Oklahoma United States
Midwestern State University United States
William Carey University United States
Texas A&M University-Victoria relative to Huntsman (United States) United States Huntsman (United States)'s profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.6×
Huntsman (United States) · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Texas A&M University-Victoria

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Texas A&M University-Victoria. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Texas A&M University-Victoria with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Texas A&M University-Victoria more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Texas A&M University-Victoria

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Texas A&M University-Victoria at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Texas A&M University-Victoria at the time of their publication.

About Texas A&M University-Victoria

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Texas A&M University-Victoria have published 1.2k papers, which have received a total of 28.0k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 117 papers in Accounting, 110 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, 72 papers in Information Systems and Management, 79 papers in Finance and 128 papers in Strategy and Management on the topics of Corporate Finance and Governance (91 papers), Digital Marketing and Social Media (59 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (53 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (50 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (49 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (44 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (42 papers) and Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth (39 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Information Systems and Management (4.5k citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (3.6k citations), Marketing (2.3k citations), Strategy and Management (3.8k citations) and Communication (1.3k citations). Authors at Texas A&M University-Victoria collaborate with scholars in United States, Canada and Australia and have published in prestigious journals including Journal of Business Ethics, International Journal of Production Economics, Aquaculture, The International Journal of Human Resource Management and The Journal of Psychology. Some of Texas A&M University-Victoria's most productive authors include June Lu, Chun‐Sheng Yu, Jie Yang, James E. Yao, Stephanie Thomas Solansky, T.T. Selvarajan, Cam Caldwell, Yun Qing Wan, Chang Liu and Donald A. Loffredo.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact