Ibero-American University Puebla

1.2k papers receiving 12.6k citations

Peers

Ibero-American University Puebla
Comparison fields: 5 of 235
  • Biochemistry 795
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 115
  • Health Informatics 114
  • Health Information Management 196
  • Information Systems 991
Replace Universidad Internacional with:
Universidad Internacional Mexico
Instituto Tecnológico Superior de Xalapa Mexico
Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación Mexico
Universidad de León Mexico
Universidad Popular Autónoma del Estado de Puebla Mexico
Universidad Autónoma de Guadalajara Mexico
University of Monterrey Mexico
Technological University of Mexico Mexico
Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Occidente Mexico
Texas A&M University – San Antonio United States
Ibero-American University Puebla relative to Universidad Internacional Mexico Universidad Internacional's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×5×
Universidad Internacional · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at Ibero-American University Puebla

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Ibero-American University Puebla. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Ibero-American University Puebla with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ibero-American University Puebla more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at Ibero-American University Puebla

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Ibero-American University Puebla at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Ibero-American University Puebla at the time of their publication.

About Ibero-American University Puebla

In recent decades, authors affiliated with Ibero-American University Puebla have published 1.7k papers, which have received a total of 14.3k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 17 papers in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, 29 papers in General Social Sciences, 252 papers in Education, 44 papers in Computer Science Applications and 57 papers in Cultural Studies on the topics of Education and Teacher Training (89 papers), Educational Innovations and Technology (85 papers), Business, Innovation, and Economy (69 papers), E-Learning and Knowledge Management (40 papers), Stress and Burnout Research (38 papers), Health and Lifestyle Studies (35 papers), Higher Education and Sustainability (35 papers) and Educational and Organizational Development (32 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Biochemistry (795 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (115 citations), Health Informatics (114 citations), Health Information Management (196 citations) and Information Systems (991 citations). Authors at Ibero-American University Puebla collaborate with scholars in Mexico, Spain and India and have published in prestigious journals including AIBR Revista de Antropologia Iberoamericana, Sustainability, Sensors, Scientific Reports and Araucaria. Some of Ibero-American University Puebla's most productive authors include Francesca Giampieri, Maurizio Antonio Battino, Imran Ashraf, Rajesh Singh, Alfredo Cuecuecha, Richard H. Jr. Adams, Tamara Yuliett Forbes-Hernández, Anita Gehlot, Isabel de la Torre Díez and Massimiliano Gasparrini.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact