United Nations Environment Programme
Impact in
- Global and Planetary Change top 5%
- Land Use and Ecosystem Services
- Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Papers in
-
- Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology 41
- Coastal and Marine Management 33
-
- Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management 72
- Land Use and Ecosystem Services 45
- Top scholars
- Angela CropperLlorenç Milà i CanalsStefanie HellwegNicolás KosoyEsteve CorberaHeidelore FiedlerChandra GiriAjay Singh
- Journals
- Environmental Conservation (24 papers)The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment (21 papers)AMBIO (13 papers)International Journal of Water Resources Development (11 papers)Ecosystem Services (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- KenyaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
United Nations Environment Programme
769 papers receiving 35.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 237
- Global and Planetary Change 13.2k
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 5.2k
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 5.5k
- Ecology 9.0k
- Ecological Modeling 1.2k
Countries citing scholars working at United Nations Environment Programme
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at United Nations Environment Programme. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at United Nations Environment Programme with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites United Nations Environment Programme more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at United Nations Environment Programme
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with United Nations Environment Programme at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with United Nations Environment Programme at the time of their publication.
About United Nations Environment Programme
In recent decades, authors affiliated with United Nations Environment Programme have published 954 papers, which have received a total of 40.2k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 154 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, 194 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 59 papers in Soil Science, 67 papers in Pollution and 24 papers in Ecological Modeling on the topics of Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (72 papers), Climate Change Policy and Economics (49 papers), Energy and Environment Impacts (46 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (45 papers), Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology (41 papers), Climate change impacts on agriculture (36 papers), Environmental Impact and Sustainability (35 papers) and Coastal and Marine Management (33 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Global and Planetary Change (13.2k citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (5.2k citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (5.5k citations), Ecology (9.0k citations) and Ecological Modeling (1.2k citations). Authors at United Nations Environment Programme collaborate with scholars in Kenya, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Environmental Conservation, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, AMBIO, International Journal of Water Resources Development and Ecosystem Services. Some of United Nations Environment Programme's most productive authors include Angela Cropper, Llorenç Milà i Canals, Stefanie Hellweg, Nicolás Kosoy, Esteve Corbera, Heidelore Fiedler, Chandra Giri, Ajay Singh, T. R. LOVELAND and Larry L. Tieszen.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.