United Nations Environment Programme
Impact in
- Global and Planetary Change top 5%
- Land Use and Ecosystem Services
- Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Papers in
-
- Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology 46
- Coastal and Marine Management 39
-
- Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management 78
- Land Use and Ecosystem Services 50
- Top scholars
- Angela CropperLlorenç Milà i CanalsStefanie HellwegNicolás KosoyEsteve CorberaHeidelore FiedlerChandra GiriAjay Singh
- Journals
- Environmental Conservation (26 papers)The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment (23 papers)AMBIO (13 papers)International Journal of Water Resources Development (11 papers)Ecosystem Services (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- KenyaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
United Nations Environment Programme
845 papers receiving 39.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 238
- Global and Planetary Change 14.5k
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 5.9k
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 5.9k
- Ecology 10.0k
- Ecological Modeling 1.3k
Countries citing scholars working at United Nations Environment Programme
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at United Nations Environment Programme. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at United Nations Environment Programme with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites United Nations Environment Programme more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at United Nations Environment Programme
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with United Nations Environment Programme at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with United Nations Environment Programme at the time of their publication.
About United Nations Environment Programme
In recent decades, authors affiliated with United Nations Environment Programme have published 1.1k papers, which have received a total of 44.5k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 173 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, 217 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 62 papers in Soil Science, 71 papers in Pollution and 26 papers in Ecological Modeling on the topics of Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (78 papers), Climate Change Policy and Economics (53 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (50 papers), Energy and Environment Impacts (48 papers), Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology (46 papers), Climate change impacts on agriculture (39 papers), Coastal and Marine Management (39 papers) and Environmental Impact and Sustainability (35 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Global and Planetary Change (14.5k citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (5.9k citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (5.9k citations), Ecology (10.0k citations) and Ecological Modeling (1.3k citations). Authors at United Nations Environment Programme collaborate with scholars in Kenya, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including Environmental Conservation, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, AMBIO, International Journal of Water Resources Development and Ecosystem Services. Some of United Nations Environment Programme's most productive authors include Angela Cropper, Llorenç Milà i Canals, Stefanie Hellweg, Nicolás Kosoy, Esteve Corbera, Heidelore Fiedler, Chandra Giri, Ajay Singh, Norman C. Duke and J. G. Masek.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.