Institute of Health Economics
Impact in
- Nephrology top 5%
- Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
- Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
- Acute Kidney Injury Research
- Family Practice top 5%
- Medication Adherence and Compliance
Papers in
-
- Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life 218
- Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy 15
- Nephrology 49
- Dialysis and Renal Disease Management 19
- Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes 15
- Top scholars
- Jeffrey A. JohnsonMarcello A. TonelliSumit R. MajumdarDon HusereauBraden MannsJosephine MauskopfStavros PetrouFederico Augustovski
- Journals
- International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care (45 papers)Quality of Life Research (22 papers)Value in Health (21 papers)Diabetes Care (18 papers)PharmacoEconomics (16 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Institute of Health Economics
739 papers receiving 51k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 209
- Nephrology 5.3k
- Family Practice 1.2k
- Economics and Econometrics 10.2k
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 756
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 2.7k
Countries citing scholars working at Institute of Health Economics
This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at Institute of Health Economics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at Institute of Health Economics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Institute of Health Economics more than expected).
Fields of papers published by authors at Institute of Health Economics
This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with Institute of Health Economics at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with Institute of Health Economics at the time of their publication.
About Institute of Health Economics
In recent decades, authors affiliated with Institute of Health Economics have published 748 papers, which have received a total of 51k indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 241 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 49 papers in Nephrology, 37 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, 8 papers in Family Practice and 11 papers in Geriatrics and Gerontology on the topics of Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (218 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (37 papers), Diabetes Treatment and Management (20 papers), Dialysis and Renal Disease Management (19 papers), Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes (15 papers), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (15 papers), Diabetes Management and Education (15 papers) and Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (15 papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Nephrology (5.3k citations), Family Practice (1.2k citations), Economics and Econometrics (10.2k citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (756 citations) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (2.7k citations). Authors at Institute of Health Economics collaborate with scholars in Canada, United States and United Kingdom and have published in prestigious journals including International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, Quality of Life Research, Value in Health, Diabetes Care and PharmacoEconomics. Some of Institute of Health Economics's most productive authors include Jeffrey A. Johnson, Marcello A. Tonelli, Sumit R. Majumdar, Don Husereau, Braden Manns, Josephine Mauskopf, Stavros Petrou, Federico Augustovski, Andrew H. Briggs and Philip Jacobs.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.